Campaign For Civic Pride: Preserving Penarths conservation areas with special architectural/historic interest: Campaigning to save Penarths tree canopy and biodiversoity also highlight need to replace our Street Trees. We say NO to the Vales LDP overdevlopment in Penarth which will wipe out our tree canopy, our green belt causing major congestion & pressure on our services. #takeourtownback
Friday, 29 July 2016
Open letter to Penarth Cllrs dismay at lack of flowers
The Penarth Civic Society would like to see the reintroduction of planting at the roundabout which would enhance the environment at that location as clearly evidenced by these photographs.
As members of Penarth Civic Society we are dismayed at the omission of a
floral display on Penarth’s central clock roundabout.
It shows a lack of accountability by the Vale
of Glamorgan Council, as well as lack of sensitivity to civic pride, sense of
place and well being, everything the town plan seeks to encourage.
The excellent floral displays in Alexandra
Gardens and on the Esplanade stand in contrast.
We ask for consultation with the civic and business communities to
guarantee future floral displays.
Anne Greagsby
Anne Greagsby
Max Wallis
Committee Members of
Penarth Civic Society
Cymdeithas Ddinesig
Tuesday, 26 July 2016
GOT TO WED to SAVE HEADLANDS TREES with Tree Protection Orders - TPOs
Penarth Town Council Planning Committee will be discussing this application on Wednesday evening, following the Town Council meeting at West House 27th July at 7.00pm.. You are able to attend the meeting. However if you wish to speak, you need to contact the Town Council offices on 02920 700721 as soon as possible, so that you can be "booked in" to speak that evening. You are given 3 minutes. You can object online here
There is an
application to fell NINE Penarth Trees with TPOs. This
is part of a scheme to fell 19 trees and reduce the crowns on
many others which will radically change this historic parkland landscape up to
the cliff-edge of Penarth Headland although it’s a habitat for owls and perhaps
other protected species, the relevant species assessment has not
been done.
1. Require the applicants to
supply proper information, sufficient to identify the individual trees, and
allow independent persons to inspect the TPO trees and enable
judgement in context of their amenity value and listing critieria. The
original TPO documents should be provided.
2. Consider
making TPOs to cover all or most of the 40 trees that are intended for felling
and lack protection at present. The scale of the felling of mature trees means
probably significant impacts on both landscape and biodiversity. Both
should be assessed.
3. Habitats
Regs assessment is also needed for protected species, given that owls are known
to forage and inhabit this area. These would inform and support the
decision on further TPOs.
5. If any
TPO trees are in the end to be felled, the Council must consider issuing treereplacement notices for each tree lost.
6. Given that more time is needed for these
assessments and decision, the Council should re-start the 6-week period once
the proper required information is received for identifying the TPO
trees. That information should include the reasons given in each TPO
notice.
7. One could suspect that this tree clearance is in advance of any planning application for building on MG 2(25) Headlands School, St. Augustine’s Road to avoid the more difficult checks and balances as in POLICY MD 3 - DESIGN OF NEW DEVELOPMENT like environmental impact assessments etc
Adjacent to the Headlands site. This other planning application 2015/01449/FUL/ has recently been re-submitted by the developers and the application still proposes the felling of 38 mature (and for the most part, healthy) trees. This I believe is an important consideration in relation to the proposal to fell trees on the Headlands site because if both proposals went ahead - 57 mature trees would be felled within a very small area . I am arguing that this % loss of habitat would be significant and could have a devastating effect on wildlife and birds.
Friday, 8 July 2016
Plans to to fell 19 Penarth Trees at Headlands school St Augustines Road
The Arboricultural Report now on the application lists at least 19 trees to be felled and many more pollarded and severely reduced in size. This is more an entire woodland area to be decimated. This will have a major impact on the landscape of Penarth locally and from afar, a not so leafy Penarth. There are no plans to bring this to the planning committee at present. We hope a Cllr will call this in. Still time to comment.
An application to fell - those trees with TPOs - Horse chestnut, 3x Sycamores, Holm Oak- 2 Cherry, Sycamore-fell, located at Main Building, Headlands School, St Augustine's Road, Penarth from Mitie Landscapes Ltd, 2,Colwick Quays, Colwick Quay Bus Park, Colwick. The decision has been delegated to officers and is due on 17th August 2016
Mrs. M. R. Krzemieniewski is the officer dealing with this now returned from holiday. she says in her email to me 'I did an urgent site visit to inspect the trees.' seems she is depending on a report saying these trees are suddenly all rotten. She says it isn't going to planning cmte as she has made the decision! (delegated to officers) Her number is 01446 704742.
A neighbour says ....and we absolutely agree ...'I am also concerned about access to the planned new houses.' Do you know anything about this?
Response from officer who proposes to permit the chopping of all these trees and those with tree protection orders
The only map from Penarth town council could provide
An application to fell - those trees with TPOs - Horse chestnut, 3x Sycamores, Holm Oak- 2 Cherry, Sycamore-fell, located at Main Building, Headlands School, St Augustine's Road, Penarth from Mitie Landscapes Ltd, 2,Colwick Quays, Colwick Quay Bus Park, Colwick. The decision has been delegated to officers and is due on 17th August 2016
The documents are now online - after a request from me to Mrs. M. R. Krzemieniewski (assistant planner for trees) with the asked for work to trees application form for trees with TPOs - Trees protected by TPO should be numbered according to the First Schedule of the Tree Preservation Order. For example - T3 oak; two
beech and one birch in G2.
You must identify the trees on a sketch plan showing the location in relation to building(s), named roads and boundaries
Mrs. M. R. Krzemieniewski is the officer dealing with this now returned from holiday. she says in her email to me 'I did an urgent site visit to inspect the trees.' seems she is depending on a report saying these trees are suddenly all rotten. She says it isn't going to planning cmte as she has made the decision! (delegated to officers) Her number is 01446 704742.
A neighbour says ....and we absolutely agree ...'I am also concerned about access to the planned new houses.' Do you know anything about this?
Map of trees with TPOs to be felled larger map below |
I object to the felling of TPO trees on headlands site, because of the loss of habitat to owls and other birds. This site has already had numerous trees felled and ironically, one of these at the front of the buildings has been carved into an owl. I am also concerned about access to the planned new houses. I suffer enough noise and disruption from the staff and taxis bringing the children to school and also from football players using the astro turf pitch during the evenings.
|
Response from officer who proposes to permit the chopping of all these trees and those with tree protection orders
Margaret Krzemieniewski received 13 July Assistant Planner Tree Preservation
Thank you for your email dated 28th June, 2016.
I am aware of concerns of Penarth residents regarding tree felling in the area. In this respect, (before taking annual leave last week from 29th June), I did an urgent site visit to inspect the trees. The application is supported by a tree inspection report prepared by a professional arboriculturist and is available on the Vale of Glamorgan’s website to view. It details the findings pertaining to each of the trees listed (under URGENT tree works). The report is part of the maintenance of mature trees that responsible tree owners have a duty to carry out assessing their health and condition. Again, in this respect, the URGENT tree work concerns trees that have been found to have levels of decay that makes their retention risky at best. Many were observed to have large cavities half way up the trunk which can lead to trees failing in high winds – and this is an elevated/windy location. With such decay present there is little option to reduce the crown. Reduction to a safe level would ultimately disfigure the trees and place further stresses on their ability to recover and may even lead to their death.
I am satisfied that the findings of the report are fair and as replacement trees of a good size would be required, if the work is allowed, these will mitigate any losses. Replacement trees can be legally enforced by the department. Moreover the tree work proposed is needed to ensure the safety of people/children at the site.
As requested I attach a copy of the relevant tree preservation order. I hope this reply helps clarify the authority’s position with this application and I thank you for your interest.
Kind Regards
Margaret Krzemieniewski
Assistant Planner Tree Preservation / Cynllunydd Cynorthwyol Cadwraeth Coed
Regeneration and Planning
Vale of Glamorgan Council / Cyngor Bro Morgannwg
Planning Application Details for : 2016/00773/TPO
Comment on this planning application
Name | Created |
---|---|
Acknowledgements | 23/06/2016 |
Application Form | 23/06/2016 |
Site Plan | 23/06/2016 |
Aerial Site Plan | 23/06/2016 |
Tree Image | 23/06/2016 |
Arboricultural Report | 23/06/2016 |
1, Paget Place, Penarth,CF64 1DP | 29/06/2016 |
The only map from Penarth town council could provide
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)