NORTHCLIFF LODGE "LITTLE BOXES" SCHEME - OPPOSED BY PENARTH COUNCIL - GETS VALE PLANNERS OK - VoG planning Cmte THURS, 5TH JAN 2017 AT 6.00 P.M.
Venue COUNCIL CHAMBER, CIVIC OFFICES
Our historic mature woodland in St. Augustine’s Ward would be trashed for spec housing on the side of the cliff.
►high risk of landslide, just above the Custom House hotel - See here
►rich reserve of up to 40 trees and wildlife to go
►a big gash in Penarth’s iconic wooded headland
►the developers refuse their share of affordable housing
►the developers pretend new residents will walk or bus to town, so plan few car-spaces, creating a parking problem
►high risk of landslide, just above the Custom House hotel - See here
►rich reserve of up to 40 trees and wildlife to go
►a big gash in Penarth’s iconic wooded headland
►the developers refuse their share of affordable housing
►the developers pretend new residents will walk or bus to town, so plan few car-spaces, creating a parking problem
Planning papers here More details Details for : 2015/01449/FUL
Lab CLLR LIS BURNETT ST AUGUSTINES WARD PENARTH @lisburnett |
VoG planning cmte - those in bold also St Augustines Ward and members of Penarth Town Council
Chairman: Councillor Fred Johnson @CllrFred
Vice-Chairman: Councillor Margaret Wilkinson
Councillors: Rhiannon Birch, Jonathan Bird, Bronwen Brooks, Lis Burnett @lisburnett, Pamela Drake, John Drysdale, Chris Franks, Eric Hacker, Howard Hamilton, Val Hartrey, Nic Hodges @NP_H13, Jeff James, Peter King @CllrKing, Andrew Parker, Bob Penrose, Anthony Powell, Audrey Preston, Gwyn Roberts and Clive Williams.
Penarth Town Council –
That the application should not be approved for the
following reasons:-
1. Overdominant form of development that could threaten the future of the
listed buildings, Custom House and Marine Building.
2. Overcrowded form of development.
3. Detrimental to this iconic headland known as the Bears Head believed to
be where the name of Penarth is derived.
4. Request the Vale Council’s own ecology officer carry out a comprehensive
ecology survey as it is considered that the submitted survey is inadequate.
Local Knowledge is aware of an extensive and active bat population.
5. The loss of so many mature trees is also of concern.
If the Vale Council is minded to approved the application the Town Council
wishes to reserve the right to comment at a later date with regard to any S106
agreement and the community needs within the locality.
No comments:
Post a Comment